Dairy Labor Conditions and Human Rights Question 1

From RankaBrand
Revision as of 15:56, 8 October 2012 by Imke (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

<<back to Dairy question list.
Next: Dairy Labor Conditions and Human Rights Question 2


Does the brand (company) have the objective to only source sustainable soy and palm for the cow’s feed by 2015 at the latest, and does the brand already purchase sustainable soy and palm for the cow’s feed in order to stop e.g. forced labor and insufficient wages?

  • Dutch version: Heeft het merk (bedrijf) zich ten doel gesteld om in uiterlijk 2015 alleen nog ‘verantwoorde’ palm en soya te gebruiken voor het voedsel van de koeien, en heeft het merk al verantwoorde palm en soya ingekocht, om onder meer gedwongen arbeid en minimum lonen tegen te gaan?
  • German version: Hat sich der Markenhersteller das Ziel gesteckt, bis spätestens 2015 ausschließlich nachhaltig produziertes Palmöl und Soja für Viehfutter zu beziehen, um schlechten Arbeitsbedingungen in der Zulieferkette entgegenzuwirken?

References and Guidelines

This question is the same as EP8, but as palm and soy also leads to forced labor and insufficient wages, this question is also applicable for the Labor Conditions and Human Rights section.

Best Practice:

  • CONO only buys SOYPSI soya (similar to RTRS)
  • Since 2011 Arla buys 50% RTRS soy and 50% from soy is derived from small family farms in Brasil.

Answering guidelines

Answer Yes:

  • [Brand] has a policy to use sustainable [palm/soy] for the cows feed, namely [...] (see link/page).
  • [Brand] uses only sustainable [palm/soy] for the cows feed, that is certified according to (see link/page...).

Answer No:

  • [Brand] explicitly claims not to use [palm/soy] for the cows feed from sustainable sources [...] (see link/page)

Answer ?:

  • [Brand] does not communicate any information about use of [palm/soy] for the cows feed. So it is not clear if the brand is committed to avoiding
  • [Brand] mentions [a sort of policy], but the brand does not mention any clear [criteria/targets/achievement].